Search results

1 – 4 of 4
Article
Publication date: 1 June 1978

Air OBE Commodore F., CEng, HonCGIA, HonFRAeS, HonFAIAA, FIMechE and MSAE FInstPet

Why not Aerospace? Because, apart from missiles and perhaps the odd satellite, we in the UK are essentially concerned for our future prosperity with the air—the vehicles that move…

Abstract

Why not Aerospace? Because, apart from missiles and perhaps the odd satellite, we in the UK are essentially concerned for our future prosperity with the air—the vehicles that move through it and engines which breathe it and drive them.

Details

Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 50 no. 6
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0002-2667

Article
Publication date: 1 July 1971

Many of the honours bestowed on the aircraft industry in the Queen's birthday list were for services to export. Hawker Siddeley Group deputy chairman and managing director JOHN…

Abstract

Many of the honours bestowed on the aircraft industry in the Queen's birthday list were for services to export. Hawker Siddeley Group deputy chairman and managing director JOHN LIDBURY has been made a Knight Bachelor. Other members of the company receiving honours are K. OLDFIELD, assistant flight works manager who receives the MBE.

Details

Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 43 no. 7
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0002-2667

Article
Publication date: 1 February 1977

Two new executive directors have been appointed by Hawker Siddeley Dynamics.

Abstract

Two new executive directors have been appointed by Hawker Siddeley Dynamics.

Details

Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 49 no. 2
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0002-2667

Article
Publication date: 1 January 1976

The Howard Shuttering Contractors case throws considerable light on the importance which the tribunals attach to warnings before dismissing an employee. In this case the tribunal…

Abstract

The Howard Shuttering Contractors case throws considerable light on the importance which the tribunals attach to warnings before dismissing an employee. In this case the tribunal took great pains to interpret the intention of the parties to the different site agreements, and it came to the conclusion that the agreed procedure was not followed. One other matter, which must be particularly noted by employers, is that where a final warning is required, this final warning must be “a warning”, and not the actual dismissal. So that where, for example, three warnings are to be given, the third must be a “warning”. It is after the employee has misconducted himself thereafter that the employer may dismiss.

Details

Managerial Law, vol. 19 no. 1
Type: Research Article
ISSN: 0309-0558

1 – 4 of 4